When I have lectured about toxicology in high school or
college classrooms, I have always found it valuable to present examples of
‘toxicants’ or ‘environmental exposures’ that are relevant to the students.
Often times I have found that if I come into a classroom and ask the students
what they think about when I say, “environmental exposures”, they respond, “Wind!
Sun!” etc., and I use this first step as a platform to try and discuss how our
‘environment’ can include the air we breathe, the food we eat, medications we
take, and any chemical that we may be exposed to. Looking for examples, I like
to ask students about their impressions on the toxicities of certain examples,
such as coffee or Tylenol. When I have given the toxicology lectures for the
freshman Environmental Health class at the University of Washington, bringing
up alcohol is always a topic that immediately gains the attention of the
students.
Heavy alcohol consumption has clear toxicologic
implications. Acute alcohol poisoning can result in overwhelming nervous system
depression leading to respiratory failure, while chronic heavy alcohol
consumption is largely dangerous due to repeated liver injury and progression into
liver cirrhosis, where liver failure occurs as healthy hepatocytes are replaced
with extensive fibrosis. Now we can all agree that heavy alcohol consumption is
dangerous and should be avoided, but, as with many questions in toxicology, the
question of lower level exposures, or moderate drinking, requires further
investigation.
As I was browsing the Health section of the New York Times,
I came across this headline:
This brief article brought attention to a recent article
published in the Journal of the National Cancer Institute, from the Washington University in St. Louis, MO.
In this study, the authors analyze the data collected from
the Nurses’ Health Study II (NHSII) cohort, where roughly 115,000 female
registered nurses completed questionnaires biennially from 1989 to 2003
answering numerous questions about their lifestyle and health status, including
alcohol consumption at different points in their lives. From these surveys,
they addressed the relationship between alcohol consumption prior to first
pregnancy and the risk of developing overt breast cancer or benign breast
disease. Although alcohol has been suggested to be associated to women’s risk
of developing breast cancer for some time, this study was unique in that it
addressed alcohol consumption rates for women between the ages of 15 and 40,
asking the question of whether or not alcohol consumption between menarche and
first pregnancy influences risk of developing breast cancer later in life. Their
observations were that women’s alcohol consumption in this time period was
positively associated with incidence of breast cancer, where an alcohol
consumption rate of 10 g/day (roughly a glass of wine a day) between menarche
and first pregnancy was associated with an 11% increase in risk of breast
cancer, with continued alcohol consumption after first pregnancy to have less
of an effect. This data would suggest that if this trend were linear, a 20
g/day alcohol consumption rate (2 glasses of wine a day) would give over a 20%
increase in risk of breast cancer.
These are concerning observations. It is particularly
concerning to me that they observed the risk of developing breast cancer increases when the time between menarche and first pregnancy is greater. As the
age of menarche in women is continuing to decrease (potentially being driven
from environmental factors including, endocrine disruptors) and the age of
first pregnancy is continuing to increase (economic and social pressures), this length of time is becoming
greater, further influencing population level risk of developing breast cancer.
The authors’ conclude that eliminating or reducing alcohol
consumption may be an effective mechanism to reduce cancer risk.
Now, although this is likely to be true, unfortunately
breast cancer is not the only disease women are at risk to suffer from.
Cardiovascular disease continues to remain the greatest cause of disease in the
Western world, and there is strong evidence that moderate alcohol consumption
reduces risk of cardiovascular disease and stroke.
In a 2009 article in JAMA, moderate alcohol consumption
(described at 5-14 drinks per week, or roughly 7 – 20 g/day) was independently
associated with a reduced risk of heart failure in men.
In what is probably the stronger association, moderate
alcohol consumption provides a significant reduction in stroke, providing a
benefit or no adverse risk in women with alcohol consumption up to 40 g/day
(roughly 4 glasses of wine/day), with greater than 40 g/day increasing risk of
stroke. Similar benefits were also observe in men.
In addition, consumption of alcohol was found to be
associated with a reduced risk of dementia in older adults. In this prospective
study, consumption of 1-6 drinks/week was associated with a reduced incident
demetia risk in both men and women. Upon stratification of the sexes, women who
consumed 7-13 drinks/week appeared to have an even lower risk of dementia,
where the calculated odds ratio for all cause dementia in women was 0.23 (95%CI
0.09-0.61), suggesting a potential reduction in risk of developing dementia by
77%.
These data provide insight into the potential for moderate
alcohol consumption to reduce risk of cardiovascular disease, stroke, and
dementia, but we must remind ourselves that these studies were focused on older
adults, and perhaps earlier alcohol consumption has a different effect.
Overall, these data are challenging to put together in a cohesive story, it may
very well be that alcohol consumption in women between menarche and first
pregnancy alters hormonal function in a manner that confers an increased risk
of developing breast cancer, a risk that could generally be looked at as an
increase in 10% risk for every drink one has on average per day, but there is
also strong evidence that this same type of moderate alcohol consumption
reduces risk of other diseases, and the question would still remain of what is
the overall risk of mortality, and what should the alcohol consumption rate be
recommended for younger women? Currently, the American Stroke Association
guideline is that men have 1-2 glass of wine per day, while women should have 1
glass of wine per day (they typically recommend red wine, due to the potential benefits
of antioxidants and polyphenols, but the epidemiological data rarely finds any
difference in beneficial effects when the type of alcohol is controlled for),
but should these guidelines be modified for younger women before their first
pregnancy?
In a recent study published in the Journal of Clinical
Oncology, alcohol consumption before and after breast cancer survival found
that moderate alcohol consumption resulted in slightly better overall survival
than non-drinkers, potentially suggesting that the benefits of moderate alcohol
consumption slightly outweigh the negative effects of increased risk of breast
cancer.
Overall, this is an extremely challenging issue that I
believe has strong implications for public health, do any of you have
suggestions on this?
Would you recommend a young woman to avoid alcohol
completely? Should we take into account those with genetic predisposition to
developing breast cancer?
Chad
ReplyDeleteThank you for putting this blog up. Wonderful content and I look forward to future posts. The critical juncture of physiology, the patient and environmental exposure is one that much deserves the attention of healthcare professionals and the public alike.
Thanks Frank! I hope this can be a good way to get some discussion going on health topics in the news. Do you happen to have any insight on alcohol consumption in younger women and men? When you see younger patients in the clinic (say under 30), do you end up recommending women to drink 1 glass of wine/day as some of the guidelines suggest?
DeleteHi Chad- Really enjoyed reading your first blog post as well & greatly appreciate the well thought out and logical way everything was presented. From my perspective as a family physician, younger or older, I am definitely never going to encourage a patient to drink alcohol from a prevention standpoint. If they already drink, sure, I will bring up potential benefits and perhaps encourage red wine over the beer or cocktail they prefer. But I am much more likely to encounter the chronic health problems related to alcohol abuse on a regular basis in my clinic. And in younger people, accidents/injuries and concerns about chronic binge drinking.
ReplyDeleteFor young women, as you stated, I think family history is critical (of both breast cancer and alcoholism) and would certainly influence my counseling. But I would be hesitant to suggest complete alcohol avoidance. More often than not, however, I use that breast cancer study (perhaps wrongly) to gently suggest to the 40-60 yo woman in my practice to think about cutting back on the 2+ drinks/night they are imbibing (they aren't drinking red wine either!).
This is a great topic and I'm definitely interested in the prevention aspect of alcohol use because, to be honest, in my experience in clinic and hospital medicine so far--- the extensive societal harms of inappropriate alcohol use whether it be health care cost related- chronic illness, injuries, MVA's etc... or the breakdown in families-- child & spouse abuse, poor familial relationships...well, it's extensive and heartbreaking.
Maggie thank you so much for your insight! Your comment on not encouraging alcohol use from a prevention standpoint is great, and one thing that is challenging about the types of epidemiological studies I referenced is that they may be limited in that if someone who is a moderate drinker has a higher chance at becoming a heavy drinker, the negative effect of becoming a heavy drinker may not be reflected in the data. The thought may be that if one is successful at maintaining a moderate drinking level, they may have some health benefits, but this does carry risk of accidents and potential future alcoholism. Thanks for the comment!
Delete